The Commissioner Of Income Tax.-Versus-Shobharaj T. Chandwani v. L. Achliya, Jj
High Court
19 Nov 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax.-Versus-Shobharaj T. Chandwani v. L. Achliya, Jj
Date of order
19 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax.-Versus-Shobharaj T. Chandwani v. L. Achliya, Jj, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
kps
*1*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10447 OF 2008INTAX APPEAL NO.74 OF 2005
WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO.10498 OF 2008
INTAX APPEAL NO.78 OF 2005
WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO.10499 OF 2008
INTAX APPEAL NO.78 OF 2005
WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO.10500 OF 2008INTAX APPEAL NO.79 OF 2005
WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO.10501 OF 2008INTAX APPEAL NO.79 OF 2005.
The Commissioner of Income Tax.-Versus-Shobharaj T. Chandwani.
..Applicant/Appellant
..Respondent
...........
Mr.Alok Sharma, Advocate for the Applicant/ Appellant.
...........
CORAM: A.V. NIRGUDE
AND V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATE :- 19[th] November, 2014
P.C.:
1Heard.
2Perused the Civil Applications.
3For the reasons stated in the Civil Applications, they are allowed. The delay in filing the said applications is condoned. The Appeals are restored to the file. The permission is granted to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased. Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith.
5The Civil Applications are, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs.
(V.L. ACHLIYA, J.)
(A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.