Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi, Mumba...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.albright Morarji & Pandit Limited, Thane

High Court 26 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.albright Morarji & Pandit Limited, Thane
Date of order
26 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.albright Morarji & Pandit Limited, Thane, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2048 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax VI, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusM/s.Albright Morarji & Pandit Limited, Thane..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2051 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax VI, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusM/s.Anand Shree Impex Private Limited, Mumbai..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2052 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax VI, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusM/s.Atco Industries Limited, Mumbai..Respondent.Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 26[th] JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1.Since the tax effect in these appeals is less than Rs.4 lakhs and in view of the office Memorandum dated 5-6-2007 issued by the C.B.D.T. and judgments of this Court in CIT V/s. Camco Colour Co. (2002) 254 I.T.R. 565 and CITV/s. Pithwa Engg. Works (2005) 276 ITR 519, learned counsel for the revenue seeks liberty to withdraw these appeals. The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. 2.Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan