The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S.avtar Singh & Co. Pvt. Ltd
High Court
09 Apr 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S.avtar Singh & Co. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
09 Apr 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S.avtar Singh & Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.610 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-VI.
...Appellant.
Vs.
M/s.Avtar Singh & Co. Pvt. Ltd.
...Respondent.
....
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
April 9, 2010.
P.C. :
The appeal has been admitted on the following
substantial question of law:
“ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law, in directing to allow netting of interest payment of Rs.9,83,828/- against gross interest receipt of Rs.15,21,487/- and thereby holding that interest payment of Rs.9,85,828/- would not form part of indirect cost for the purpose of section 80HHC(3)(b) of the Income Tax Act without controverting the finding of the fact given by CIT(A) that interest payment of Rs.9,83,828/- had no nexus with interest receipt of Rs.15,21,47/-.”
The Respondent is absent though served. Affidavit of
service has been filed.
The Tribunal has disposed of the appeal with the
following directions:
“i) as far as the interest is concerned, benefit of netting off will be given;
-ii) Profit on DEPB licences would form part of the profit for the purpose of Section 80-HHC.”
For the purpose of this appeal, it would suffice if a direction is issued by the Court to the effect that the Assessing Officer shall have due regard to the judgment of this Court dated
18th/19[th] March 2010 in CIT vs.Asian Star Co.Ltd. (Income Tax Appeal 200 of 2009). In view of this direction, it is not necessary to answer the question of law as framed. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.