Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S.greaves Limited

High Court 07 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S.greaves Limited
Date of order
07 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S.greaves Limited, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The notice of motion as also the appeal are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3738 OF 2004 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1563 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax-VI .. Applicant Versus M/s.Greaves Limited .. Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the applicant. Mr.S.J. Mehta for the respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C. : 1. Insofar as question (a) is concerned, the same is covered by the Judgment of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 6th August, 2007 in the assessee’s own case. The question has been answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 2. Insofar as question (b) is concerned, the same is covered by the Judgment reported in 290 ITR 667. The question has been answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue 3. In view of above, learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the notice of motion and the appeal. 2 4. The notice of motion as also the appeal are dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Refund of Court fee as per rules. 6. Certified copy expedited. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan