The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur And Others v. Anjuman Hami-E-Islam And Another
High Court
06 Feb 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur And Others v. Anjuman Hami-E-Islam And Another
Date of order
06 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur And Others v. Anjuman Hami-E-Islam And Another, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION Z. NO.6/2014INLETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.245/2006IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2227/1992 (D)
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur and others...Versus...
Anjuman Hami-E-Islam and another
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for petitionersShri M.G. Bhangde, Sr. Adv. for R - 1
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.DATE: 06.02.2014
Heard.
Since the appeal is of the year 2006, early hearing is
granted. Post the appeal for hearing on 10.04.2014.
Civil Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.