Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur And Others v. Anjuman Hami-E-Islam And Another

High Court 06 Feb 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur And Others v. Anjuman Hami-E-Islam And Another
Date of order
06 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur And Others v. Anjuman Hami-E-Islam And Another, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION Z. NO.6/2014INLETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.245/2006IN WRIT PETITION NO.2227/1992 (D) The Commissioner of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur and others...Versus... Anjuman Hami-E-Islam and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for petitionersShri M.G. Bhangde, Sr. Adv. for R - 1 CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.DATE: 06.02.2014 Heard. Since the appeal is of the year 2006, early hearing is granted. Post the appeal for hearing on 10.04.2014. Civil Application stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan