Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. Leave Granted. The Appeal Stands Dismissed As Withdrawn

High Court 26 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

26 Jul 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. Leave Granted. The Appeal Stands Dismissed As Withdrawn, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Income Tax Appeal No. 82/2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur..vs.. Smt. Sushila P. Patil, Malkapur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's Orders ordirections and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: A. P. LAVANDE & R. V. MORE, JJ.DATED : 26thJuly, 2007 Mr. Jaiswal, Advocate for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal since the tax effect is less than Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rs. Four Lacs) in view of the circular dated 05.06.2007 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Leave granted. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Registrar (Judicial) to refund the Court fees to the appellant if permissible under the law. JUDGE JUDGE kahale

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.