The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Vidarbha), Nagpur v. M/S. Ballarpur Industries Ltd., New Delhi
High Court
11 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Vidarbha), Nagpur v. M/S. Ballarpur Industries Ltd., New Delhi
Date of order
11 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Vidarbha), Nagpur v. M/S. Ballarpur Industries Ltd., New Delhi, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
itr.61.94
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.61 OF 1994
(The Commissioner of Income-tax (Vidarbha), Nagpur
vs.
M/s. Ballarpur Industries Ltd., New Delhi)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Ordersor directions and Registrar’s orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Shri S.N. Bhattad, Advocate for the Applicant.Shri K.P. Dewani, Advocate for the Non-Applicant.
CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ANDV.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
th FEBRUARY, 2016.
DATE : 11
Following two questions have been referred to thisCourt, which read thus :
“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case, the ITAT was justified in cancelling the orderpassed by the CIT u/s 263(1) of the Act and inrestoring the order of the Assessing Officer ?
2. Whether one unit of the assessee companygenerating steam and power can be considered to havemade the sale to another unit of the same plant of theassessee and in turn generate profits for the purpose ofsection 80HH ?”
Perusal of the rectification order under section 154read with section 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 passed on
15/04/1988 shows the total dis-allowance in dispute to beRs.10,03,113/-. Therefore, even if reference is answered infavour of the department, resulted tax effect is Rs.5,76,790/-.
In this situation, applying Instruction No.21, dated
10/12/2015, we return the reference unanswered.
*sandesh
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.