The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. M/S. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Tumsar
High Court
28 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. M/S. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Tumsar
Date of order
28 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. M/S. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Tumsar, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
itr.7.88
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Income Tax Reference No.7 of 1988
(The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur vs. M/s. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Tumsar)
with
Income Tax Reference No.1 of 1989
(The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur vs. M/s. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Tumsar)withIncome Tax Reference No.61B of 1988
(The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur vs. M/s. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Tumsar)with
Income Tax Reference No.284(B) of 1988
(The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur vs. M/s. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Tumsar)with
Income Tax Reference No.1 of 1990
(The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur vs. M/s. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Tumsar)with
Income Tax Reference No.123 of 1995
(The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur vs. M/s. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Tumsar)=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Ordersor directions and Registrar’s orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Shri S.N. Bhattad, Advocate for the Applicant.
Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Non-Applicant.
CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ANDV.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2016.
DATE
We have heard the respective Counsel on impact ofCircular No.21, dated 10/12/2015 on these pending referencesYesterday and after holding that pending references shall also begoverned by revised monetary valuation of Rs.20.00 lacs, weadjourned the matters to today to find out tax effect in thesematters.
Today, the learned Counsel for revenue has tendereda chart, which gives the tax effect in each matter. The said chartis reproduced below for ready reference.
Though in ITR Nos.7/1988, 61/1988 and 1/1989,there are three separate orders, as the orders passed by thelower authority are not composite and are in relation to threedifferent assessment years, the above mentioned circular appliesas in none of these assessment years, tax effect exceeds Rs.20.00lacs.
In ITR No.123/1995, though reference is compositefor five assessment years, the cumulative tax effect is less thanRs.20.00 lacs.
As such all these references are returned
unanswered. No costs.
JUDGEJUDGE*sandesh
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.