The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. M/S Khare & Tarkunde, Nagpur
High Court
28 Oct 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. M/S Khare & Tarkunde, Nagpur
Date of order
28 Oct 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. M/S Khare & Tarkunde, Nagpur, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No.100 OF 1993
(The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur ..vs.. M/s Khare & Tarkunde, Nagpur)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for the applicant.
CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 28th OCTOBER, 2010
Learned Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the tax effect involved in this reference is less than the monetary limit prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. In the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT .vs. Pithwa Engineering Worksreported in(2005) 276 ITR 519 (Bom.),the reference is returned unanswered. No order as to costs.
JUDGEJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue