The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. M/S Shakti Boring Corpn., Nagpur
High Court
28 Oct 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. M/S Shakti Boring Corpn., Nagpur
Date of order
28 Oct 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. M/S Shakti Boring Corpn., Nagpur, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No.68 OF 1993
(The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur ..vs.. M/s Shakti Boring Corpn., Nagpur)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for the applicant
CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 28th OCTOBER, 2010
Learned Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the tax effect involved in this reference is less than the monetary limit prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. In the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT .vs. Pithwa Engineering Worksreported in(2005) 276 ITR 519 (Bom.),the reference is returned unanswered. Hence, the reference is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue