The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. Respondent :-M/S. Hariganga Alloys & Steel Ltd., Nagpur
High Court
27 Oct 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. Respondent :-M/S. Hariganga Alloys & Steel Ltd., Nagpur
Date of order
27 Oct 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. Respondent :-M/S. Hariganga Alloys & Steel Ltd., Nagpur, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: Income Tax Reference is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.09/2001
APPLICANT:-
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur....VERSUS...
RESPONDENT :-M/s. Hariganga Alloys & Steel Ltd., Nagpur.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Adv. for applicant][S/Shri C.J., N.J., S.C. Thakkar, Advs. for respondent]
CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 27.10.2010
1.At the instance of Commissioner of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this Court.
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that no penalty under section 271 (1) (c) read with explanation 4 there to is eligible where the assessed income is NIL or negative income ?”
2.Learned Counsel for both sides agree that the aforesaid question is covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax...Versus...Gold Coin Health Food P. Ltd.., reported in (2008) 304 ITR 308 (SC).
3.Accordingly, the question referred to us is answered in the negative i.e. in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. The Tribunal is accordingly directed to pass appropriate order in accordance with the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court.
Income Tax Reference is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.