Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. The Vidarbha Co-Operative Marketing Society Limited, Nagpur

High Court 11 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. The Vidarbha Co-Operative Marketing Society Limited, Nagpur
Date of order
11 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur v. The Vidarbha Co-Operative Marketing Society Limited, Nagpur, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.11 OF 1998 (The Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur vs. The Vidarbha Co-operative Marketing Society Limited, Nagpur) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Ordersor directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri S.N. Bhattad, Advocate for the Applicant.Shri K.P. Dewani, Advocate for the Non-Applicant. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ANDV.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. th FEBRUARY, 2016. DATE : 11 Following questions have been referred to this Courtarising out of four appeals decided by the I.T.A.T. for differentassessment years. “1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Tribunal was correct in allowing therebate in respect of sale of fertilizers to its membersand non members and in directing the Income-taxOfficer to delete the disallowance ? 2. Whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct inholding that the rebate in respect of sale cannot betreated as an application of profit and it has noconnection in profit of the assessee, which could betreated as an application of profit and the decision soarrived at was in accordance with the provisions oflaw ? The chart showing assessment year disputed dis-allowance and tax effect in each year respectively and totalthereof is reproduced below : The chart shows that the tax effect in any assessmentyear does not exceed Rs.20.00 lakhs and its cumulative effectalso is less than Rs.20.00 lakhs. In this situation, following Instruction No.21, dated10/12/2015, we return the reference unanswered. *sandesh JUDGEJUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan