The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Vii,Chennai v. M/S.jemi Traders
High Court
28 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Vii,Chennai v. M/S.jemi Traders
Date of order
28 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Vii,Chennai v. M/S.jemi Traders, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.01.2016
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal No.1178 of 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - VII,Chennai.
..Appellant/Appellant
-Versus-
M/s.Jemi Traders,No.38, Police Commissioner Office Road,Egmore, Chennai 600 008.(PAN No. ) ..Respondent/Respondent
Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench, dated07.06.2010, in I.T.A.No.1768/Mds/2009 against the Order passedby the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) IX Chennai-34. madein ITA.NO.211-08-09 Order Dt.12.08.2009 for the Assessment Year2006-2007 and against the Order Passed by The Asst.Commissionerof Income Tax, Chennai-34, made in PAN/GIR.NO. OrderDated 29.12.2008 for the Assessment Year 2006-2007.
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue hadsubmitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdrawthe present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department ofRevenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is lessthan Rs.20,00,000/-.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
cla/rg Sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/Sub Asst. RegistrarTo:1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) IX, Chennai-34.3. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, K1, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.+ 1 cc to Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, Advocate Sr 5840
KR/3/2/16
Tax Case Appeal No.1178 of 2010
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.