The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aatur Holdings Pvt.ltd
High Court
19 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aatur Holdings Pvt.ltd
Date of order
19 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aatur Holdings Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: 20 of 2001, there is no merit in these appeals, which are accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Aatur Holdings Pvt.Ltd. ... Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Growmore Exports Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale for
the Appellants.
Mr. F.V. Irani with Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. The issue which arises in these appeals is
similar to which raised in Income Tax Appeal No. 20
of 2001. Before the tribunal, these two appeals
along with subject matter of Income Tax Appeal No.
20 of 2001 were disposed of by common order after
discussing the facts in Appeal No. 5897 of 1995
which corresponds to Income Tax Appeal No. 20 of
2007 before this court.
((-2-))
. As the facts are similar for the reasons recorded
in Income Tax Appeal No. 20 of 2001, there is no
merit in these appeals, which are accordingly
disposed of.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.