Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ambala...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ambalal Sarabhai D. Trust

High Court 27 Nov 1996 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ambalal Sarabhai D. Trust
Date of order
27 Nov 1996
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ambalal Sarabhai D. Trust, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 59 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. ============================================================ -------------------------------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus AMBALAL SARABHAI D. TRUST NO.5 -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR RK PATEL for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and� MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. Date of decision: 27/11/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT This application was earlier rejected by the Division Bench on 29.3.1989. The Department had, by this application, sought for a direction on the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to refer the questions suggested in paragraph 4 of the application. The Supreme Court by its order dated 21.3.1996 made in Civil Appeal No.5194 of 1996 has set aside the said order of the High Court and has directed this High Court to examine the question in the light of the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kamalini Khatau reported in 209 ITR 101. In view of this direction of the Supreme Court, we direct the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench "A" to raise and refer for the opinion of this Court the questions suggested in paragraph 4 of the application alongwith the statement of case so as to reach the registry by 7th December, 1996. The reference should be listed for hearing on 16.12.1996. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. -----
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan