In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Amit Anil Biswas, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.659 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax..AppellantVersusAmit Anil Biswas..Respondent
None for appellantMr. Jitendra Jain with Mr. P.C. Tripathi i/b. Raj Darak for respondent.
CORAM:M.S.SANKLECHA &SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. DATE :13[th] June 2018.
P.C.
1]This appeal was called out earlier, when none appeared in support of this appeal. Thus this appeal was kept back at the bottom of admission board. When again this appeal was called out, noobody appeared. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal.
2]Advocates and parties were put to notice on 30[th] May 2018 that this appeal shall be listed on board today and no adjournment would be granted. Inspite of this clear notice, none
2]
YBG
appears in support of this appeal. Hence, this appeal is dismissed
for non prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue