The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Amol D. Gawaskar
High Court
12 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Amol D. Gawaskar
Date of order
12 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Amol D. Gawaskar, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 131 of 2009, we find no merit in these appeals which are also accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3723 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3723 OF 200
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Amol D. Gawaskar ... Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3724 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3724 OF 200
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Amol D. Gawaskar ... Respondent
Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant.
None for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 12, 2009
DATED: MARCH 12, 2009
P.C.
P.C.
. The matters not on board. With the consent of
the learned counsel, taken on board and heard
forthwith.
. The appeals are filed in respect of the common
order dated 30.5.2008 arising from Income Tax Appeal
Nos.2064, 2065 and 2066/Mum/2005. In respect of the
assessment year 1998-99 being Income Tax Appeal No.
131 of 2009, we have dismissed the appeal for the
reasons set out therein.
. As the issue involved in these appeals are same
and for the same reasons given while dismissing
Income Tax Appeal No. 131 of 2009, we find no merit
in these appeals which are also accordingly
dismissed.
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue