The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anil Kumar Bansal
High Court
08 Jan 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anil Kumar Bansal
Date of order
08 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anil Kumar Bansal, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~47 to 49, 53, 55 to 62
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decided on: 8[th] January, 2015
+
ITA 669/2009
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
versus
ANIL KUMAR BANSAL ..... Respondent + ITA 670/2009 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus ANIL KUMAR BANSAL ..... Respondent + ITA 711/2009 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus
SADHU RAM AGGARWAL
..... Respondent
+
ITA 1075/2009
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX XIII ..... Appellant
versus
BHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN
..... Respondent
+ ITA 1318/2009 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus
..... Appellant
SUNIL JAIN ..... Respondent + ITA 196/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus ANU AGGARWAL ..... Respondent + ITA 198/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus GAURI SHANKAR AGGARWAL ..... Respondent + ITA 279/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus SANJAY RAI CHOWDHARY ..... Respondent + ITA 777/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus
GALLRI DEVI ..... Respondent + ITA 1145/2010 CIT ..... Appellant versus RASHMI MONGA ..... Respondent + ITA 1313/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus MONIKA SAXENA ..... Respondent + ITA 1326/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus MONIKA SAXENA ..... Respondent
Presence : Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr.Ruchir Bhatia and Mr.Akash Vajpai, Advocates for the Revenue in ITA Nos. 669/2009, 670/2009, 711/2009, 1075/2009, 1318/2009, 196/2010, 198/2010 279/2010, 777/2010 1145/2010, 1313/2010 & 1326/2010.
Mr. Pranjal Srivastava and Mr. V.M.Chaurasia, Advocates for respondent in ITA Nos. 669/2009, 670/2009 and 1075/2009.
Mr. Salil Kapoor & Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocates for respondents in ITA Nos. 711/2009 and 1145/2010.
Mr.Piyush Kaushik, Advocate for respondent in ITA No. 1318/2009
Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Ms.Poonam Ahuja, Mr.Mukul Mathur, Advocates for the respondent in ITA No. 279/2010.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT)
%
For detailed judgment, the decision dated 08.01.2015 in ITA No.648/2009 may be referred to.
JANUARY 08, 2015
mr
S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE)
R.K.GAUBA (JUDGE)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.