The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Azmin Zal Balsara
High Court
24 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Azmin Zal Balsara
Date of order
24 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Azmin Zal Balsara, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2051 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Azmin Zal Balsara
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Ms.Aarti Sathe for respondent.
P.C.
Heard.
Perused appeal.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE :
24TH NOVEMBER,2009
2.This appeal is directed against the order dated 22nd January, 2008. We were taken through the order passed by the Tribunal and the reasoning recorded therein. During the course of hearing, Learned Counsel for the respondent brought to our notice certain judgments from Gujarat High Court, Madras High Court and M.P.High Court (See CIT Vs. Suman Paper & Boards Ltd. (2009) 221 CTR (Guj) 781, EasternProduce Co. Vs. Income Tax Officer (2006) 286 ITR 353 (Mad) and ANBU Textiles Vs.Asstt. CIT 262 ITR 684 (Mad), CIT Vs. Vimla Khatri (2007) 288 ITR 168 (MP). On going through the said judgments, one can presume that the view taken by the Tribunal is a reasonable and possible view. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue