In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bajaj Auto Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2659 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Bajaj Auto Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Ms.Vasanti Patel for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE :
5TH DECEMBER,2009
P.C.
1.Heard.
Perused appeal.
Office objections are overruled. Registry to register the appeal. At the request of learned Counsel for the appellant, the appeal is taken up for hearing.
2.Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states that the issue involved in the appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs.M/s.Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. in ITXA No.198 of 2009 decided on 15th April, 2009(unreported). In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue