Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Biresh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Biresh Shah

High Court 05 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Biresh Shah
Date of order
05 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Biresh Shah, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Under these circumstances, we areconstrained to dismiss the above Appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1560 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.Biresh Shah Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. P.C. ..Appellant ..Respondent CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 5TH AUGUST, 2008 1.Mr.Sahadevan states that the Revenue has not even bothered to brief him even though he has filed Vakalatnama in the above matter. 2.On 15th July,2007 when the above matter was onboard, it was adjourned to 22nd July,2007 to enablethe Appellant to serve the Respondent. However, as itwas not complied with, on 22nd July,2008 again thematter was adjourned to 5th August,2008 i.e. today.Even today also Mr.Sahadevan fairly states that theAppellant has not taken any steps to serve theRespondent. Under these circumstances, we areconstrained to dismiss the above Appeal. Hence, thesame stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan