The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Carmel Haven, Pune
High Court
23 Jun 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Carmel Haven, Pune
Date of order
23 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Carmel Haven, Pune, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.914 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.910 OF 2017
The Commissioner of Income Tax....Applicant(Exemption), Pune
In the matter between
The Commissioner of Income Tax....Appellant(Exemption), Pune
Vs.
Carmel Haven, Pune
....Respondent
Mr. Sham V. Walve for the Applicant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 23 JUNE, 2017
PER COURT :
We have heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. The affidavit of service is filed on record. None appears for the Respondent.
Dusane
2/2
2For the reasons stated in the affidavit supporting the Notice of Motion, the Motion is allowed. The delay of 15 days caused in filing the Appeal is condoned. The Motion is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
( G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue