Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chandr...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chandragupta Traders Pvt. Ltd

High Court 29 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chandragupta Traders Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
29 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chandragupta Traders Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 29TH OCTOBER 2007 P.C. .The question raised in this Appeal are similar towhat were in issue in Income Tax Appeal No.607 of 2005. the reasons given therein the question of law as raisedwould not arise and consequently Appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1957 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant Vs. Chandragupta Traders Pvt. Ltd...Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant.Mr. J.D. Mistry with Mr. Raj Darak, for the respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 29TH OCTOBER 2007 P.C. .The question raised in this Appeal are similar towhat were in issue in Income Tax Appeal No.607 of 2005. the reasons given therein the question of law as raisedwould not arise and consequently Appeal stands disposed of. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J) For
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan