The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chheda Jewellery Mart
High Court
18 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chheda Jewellery Mart
Date of order
18 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chheda Jewellery Mart, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.841 OF 2000WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.842 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.Chheda Jewellery Mart
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevn for the Appellant.Mr.K.Gopal with Mr.Paras S.Savla for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 18TH JULY, 2008
P.C..Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Asthe tax liability involved in the above Appeals isless than Rs.4/- lacs, Mr.Sahadevan, the learnedCounsel for the Appellants seeks leave to withdraw thesame..In view thereof, both the above Appeals areallowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.Permissible Court Fees be refunded to the Appellant,as per rules.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue