Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Colgat...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd

High Court 18 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

18 Sep 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 358 OF 2006 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 188 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 CORAM: F.I. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . Question No. 2 is covered by the Supreme Court Judgment reported in 290 ITR 667 and the first question is covered by the judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 18.2.2002, in Income Tax Appeal No. 741 of 2000 in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd. a S.L.P. against which was dismissed on 10.11.2003. Appeal dismissed as the questions of law do not survive. The Motion is also dismissed as infructous. Refund of court fees as per rules. C.C. expedited. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.