Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Columb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc

High Court 09 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc
Date of order
09 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4019 OF 2008 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2891 OF 2008 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4019 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2891 OF 200 WITH 08 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4020 OF 20 08 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4020 OF 20 WITH WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2889 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2889 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2889 OF 2008 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4021 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4021 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2874 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2874 OF 2008 WITH 8 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4043 OF 200 8 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4043 OF 200 8 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4043 OF 200 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2872 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2872 OF 200 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2872 OF 200 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Columbia Pictures Industries Inc.. Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. 9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200 P.C. . Considering the cause shown delay condoned. Office to register the appeals. . In so far as appeals are concerned, the issue is covered by the judgment of this court in Notice of Motion No. 4648 of 2007 along with I.T.A. (L) No. 2501 of 2007 in the case of Director of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Warner Brothers, decided on 17th March, 2008. Considering what is set out therein, present question of law as framed would not arise and consequently appeals dismissed. . We may also note that for the assessment year 2001-2002 as also for the assessment year 2002-2003 the A.O.itself has accepted the returns filed on the similar basis. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan