Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Daga L...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Daga Leasing & Finance Ltd

High Court 27 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Daga Leasing & Finance Ltd
Date of order
27 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Daga Leasing & Finance Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2372 OF 2002 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 707 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax] .. Appellant Versus Daga Leasing & Finance Ltd.] .. Respondent Mr. R. Ashokan i/b Mr. K.B. Rao for the appellant.None for the respondent. DATED:27TH JUNE, 2008 P.C.: 1.By this Notice of Motion, the appellant -Commissioner of Income tax has approached this court forcondonation of delay of 30 days in filing the Income TaxAppeal (Lodg.) No.707 of 2002. 2.The learned counsel for the appellant ispresent. However, the respondent is absent. No replyhas been filed. Therefore, the rule of non traverse ofpleadings will apply. For the reasons stated in theAffidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the thirty days delay is condoned. 3.Office is directed to number the Income TaxAppeal and process the same for admission.4.Notice of Motionstands disposed ofaccordingly. Sd/-[A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.] Sd/-[S.B. MHASE, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan