Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Datama...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Datamatics Financial Software And Services Ltd

High Court 09 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Datamatics Financial Software And Services Ltd
Date of order
09 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Datamatics Financial Software And Services Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2262 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2065 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Sundaram Multipap Ltd. ..Appellant..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.None for respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2263 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2024 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Brescon Share and Stock Brokers Ltd. ..Appellant..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.None for respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2264 OF 2009 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2066 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Iland F.S.Venture Corpn. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.None for respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2265 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1986 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.D.H.L.Express I.P. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.None for respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2269 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2362 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Indian Oil Corporation ..Appellant..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.None for respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2271 OF 2009 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.446 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.Iland FS Wind Farms Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Mr.S.G.Dalal for respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2275 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2698 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Precision Gears Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Ms.Aasifa Khan for respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2298 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2453 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. ..Appellant Datamatics Financial Software and Services Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.None for respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2299 OF 2009 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2570 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.EBERS Pharmaceuticals Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.None for respondent. P.C. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 9TH JULY, 2009 DATE : 1.By the above Notices of Motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of delay in filing the above appeals. Admittedly, all these appeals are barred by limitation. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.In this view of the matter, all the above Notices of Motion are dismissed being barred by limitation. 3.In view of dismissal of Notices of Motion, appeal papers be consigned to record. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan