The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dhru & Co
High Court
09 Jan 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dhru & Co
Date of order
09 Jan 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dhru & Co, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 3.The learned Counsel for the Applicant statesthat the Revenue is not able to trace the record and unable to state that whether the earlier order passedby the Tribunal was challenged or not.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.Dhru & Co.
..Applicant
..Respondent
Mr.A.Kotangale i/b.Mr.H.D.Rathod for the Applicant.Mr.J.D.Mistry i/b. M/s.Dhruv & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 9TH JANUARY,2007
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Itappears that the two questions have been raised in theapplication, which read as under :-
M/s.Pathare Dhru & Co. assessed in the handsof the assessee on substantive basis be
excluded therefrom to be taxed on substantivebasis in the hands of M/s.Pathare Dhru & Co.?
2.With regard to both the aforesaid questions,
the Tribunal has relied upon its own decision of the
earlier Assessment Year.
3.The learned Counsel for the Applicant statesthat the Revenue is not able to trace the record and
unable to state that whether the earlier order passedby the Tribunal was challenged or not.
4.Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
there is no substantial question of law involved in
the matter. Hence, the Application stands dismissed.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.