In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dilipkumar V.lakhi, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1522 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Dilipkumar V.Lakhi
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.K.R.Choudhary i/b. Ms.Anuradha Mane for appellant.
Ms.Aarti Sathe for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE :
7TH OCTOBER, 2009
P.C.
1.Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Perused appeal.
2.So far as first question is concerned, it does not arise from the order passed by the Tribunal and the second question is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Badridas Gauridu (P) Ltd. 261ITR 256. The very same judgment has been relied upon by the Tribunal. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue