In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dimexon Diamonds Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. [J.P.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1175 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-..Appellantvs.
Dimexon Diamonds Ltd... Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/by Anamika Malhotra for AppellantMr.S.J. Mehta for Respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED :19[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C.:
1.On the motion made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. Since the tax impact is less than Rs.4 Lakhs, the Revenue shall be entitled for refund of permissible Court fees.
2.Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]
[V.C. DAGA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue