The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dinesh K.makhija
High Court
19 Dec 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dinesh K.makhija
Date of order
19 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dinesh K.makhija, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2177 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Dinesh K.Makhija
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant
None for respondent
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 19TH DECEMBER,2009
DATE :
P.C.
1.Heard learned Counsel for the appellant.
2.In the present case, the dispute is regarding addition made on account of hawala transactions. Admittedly, the declaration made in VDIS and the certificate issued therein have not yet been withdrawn by the Department. Under these circumstances, the finding recorded by the Tribunal apart from being finding of fact is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Uttamchand Jainreported in 182 Taxman 243 Bom. In this view of the matter, we see no merit in the appeal. The same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue