The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr.babasaheb Ambedkar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
High Court
13 Jan 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr.babasaheb Ambedkar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
13 Jan 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr.babasaheb Ambedkar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: Since the issue and question of Law is identical and equally the direction in the Division Bench judgment binds the parties before us, then, in terms of the order dated 10/02/2012, this Tax Appeal is also disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
TAX APPEAL NO.43 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax
APPELLANT
VERSUS
Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.,
RESPONDENT
Mr.A.M.Sharma, Advocate for appellant.Mr.V.D.Salunke, Advocate for respondent.
(CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, JJ.)
DATE : 13/01/2014
PER COURT:
1.It is stated that the controversy in the present Tax Appeal is identical to Tax Appeal No.127/2008, which has been disposed of on 10/02/2012 by the Division Bench.
2.We are informed by both Counsel that the only question of Law,
which arises for determination and consideration in this appeal of the Revenue is identical to the one framed by the Division Bench in its order dated 10/02/2012. Since the issue and question of Law is
identical and equally the direction in the Division Bench judgment binds the parties before us, then, in terms of the order dated 10/02/2012, this Tax Appeal is also disposed of. The same order would operate in present Appeal, as well.
( RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J.)( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue