The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr.nayan C.shah
High Court
01 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr.nayan C.shah
Date of order
01 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr.nayan C.shah, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.782 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.782 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
Dr.Nayan C.Shah .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 1st August, 2008
DATE : 1st August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this Appeal as the tax effect involved is less
than Rs.4 lakhs. Appeal is therefore allowed to be
withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. Permissible
Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the
Rules.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue