The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dr.ramswaroop M. Sharma
High Court
07 Aug 2002 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dr.ramswaroop M. Sharma
Date of order
07 Aug 2002
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dr.ramswaroop M. Sharma, the High Court (2002) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus DR.RAMSWAROOP M.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 334 of 1999
to
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 343 of 1999
with
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 414 of 1999
to
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 419 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO
Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
@
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
DR.RAMSWAROOP M. SHARMA
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX APPLICATION No. 334 of 1999
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1
MR SN SOPARKAR for Respondent No. 1
2. INCOME TAX APPLICATION No. 414 of 1999
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
Date of decision: 07/08/2002
COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�Heard Mr Manish R Bhatt, learned Senior Standing
Counsel appearing for the applicant- revenue and Mr Kaji
learned counsel for the respondent- assessee.
2.�Having heard the learned counsel for the parties,
we are of the view that the following common questions of
law arise in all these matters:-
(i) Whether, in light of the provisions of Section
145 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Income-tax
Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts
in substantially deleting the additions and in confirming the deletions made by the CIT (Appeals) in respect of suppressed medical
treatment receipts?
(ii) Whether, having regard to the provisions of
Chapter V of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law and
on facts in deleting the additions made in
respect of clubbing of income of Mrs. JJ
Christian from the business M/s. Pashmi Ads in
the hands of the assessee?
�The Tribunal shall accordingly draw a statement
of case and refer the above questions for our opinion.
3.�The applications are accordingly allowed. Rule
is made absolute to the aforesaid extent with no order as
to costs.
���(M.S. Shah,J)�(K.A. Puj,J)
zgs/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.