The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Eastern International Hotels Ltd
High Court
29 Jun 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Eastern International Hotels Ltd
Date of order
29 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Eastern International Hotels Ltd, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 672 of 1987
The Commissioner of Income Tax
... Applicant.
vs.
Eastern International Hotels Ltd., ..... Respondents
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for Applicant.Ms. Kusum Kanajia i/b. M. Jamietram for Respondent.
CORAM: V. C. DAGA
AND
A. S. AGUIAR JJ.
Date:29[th] June, 2005.
P. C.:
1. Both counsel appearing for the parties submit that the disputeinvolved in the present reference has already been settled since theassessee has already paid the tax under KVSS -1998 and hasdischarged its tax liability. involved in the present reference has already been settled since theassessee has already paid the tax under KVSS -1998 and hasdischarged its tax liability.
2. In this view of the matter, it is not necessary to answer the questionreferred to this court. By consent of the parties this reference standsreturned unanswered, with no order as to costs. referred to this court. By consent of the parties this reference standsreturned unanswered, with no order as to costs.
3. The letter and the xerox copies of the relevant documents furnished
by the learned counsel for the assessee showing settlement andpayment of taxes is taken on record.
(V. C. DAGA J. )
-x-
(A. S. AGUIAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue