The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ecd Electronics
High Court
24 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ecd Electronics
Date of order
24 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ecd Electronics, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On failure to remove the office objections, the appeal stand dismissed for non prosecution without further orders from this court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 708 OF 2009
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 708 OF 200
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2653 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2653 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
ECD Electronics ... Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for
Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Heard the learned counsel.
. The delay is of 91 days.
. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal subject to appellants removing the office objections, if any within six
weeks from today. On failure to remove the office objections, the appeal stand dismissed for non prosecution without further orders from this court.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue