The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Escorts Finance Limited
High Court
15 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Escorts Finance Limited
Date of order
15 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Escorts Finance Limited, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIR-188
+ ITA 421/2004
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing counsel.
..... Appellant
versus
ESCORTS FINANCE LIMITED
..... Respondent
Through: Proxy counsel (appearance not given) for Mr. Simran Mehta, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R% 09.05.2016
1. It is stated that Mr. Simran Mehta, learned counsel for the Respondent is stated to be in some personal difficulty.
2. List on 15[th] September 2016 in the category of After Notice Misc. Matters.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 09, 2016/Rm
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue