The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Estate Of J.k.s.nicholson
High Court
14 Oct 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Estate Of J.k.s.nicholson
Date of order
14 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Estate Of J.k.s.nicholson, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter the appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2265 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.Estate of J.K.S.Nicholson
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.A.S.Shivsharan for appellant.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 14TH OCTOBER, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
1.Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused appeal. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
2.The question sought to be raised in this appeal revolves around deleting the addition of Rs.43,49,991/- made by A.O. On account of sale of jewellery u/s.68 of the I.T.Act,1961. The Tribunal has considered this issue in paragraph No.5 of its order. We were taken through the observations and findings recorded by the Tribunal. The Tribunal, after appreciation of evidence available on record, has recorded a clear finding of fact with which no fault can be found. We do not find any fault with the same. In this view of the matter the appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.