In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ghodganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Both the appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.156 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.157 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant.
Versus
Ghodganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue.2.He fairly states that the question sought to be raised in these appeals is squarely covered by the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of CITV/s. Manjara SSK Limitedreported in [2008] 301 ITR 191(Bom). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. Both the appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue