In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gopal Rajgopalan, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appealS stand dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2258 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2259 OF 2008WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2261 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Gopal Rajgopalan
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009
DATE :
Heard.
Perused appeal.
The issue sought to be raised in these appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. Narendra Desai 2008(1) DTR (Bom)106. Learned Counsel for the Revenue tried to distinguish the said judgment but could not take his submissions to the logical end. In this view of the matter, appealS stand dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue