The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Goyal M.g. Glass Ltd
High Court
04 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Goyal M.g. Glass Ltd
Date of order
04 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Goyal M.g. Glass Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIR-26
+ ITA 92/2005
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel.
versus
GOYAL M.G. GLASS LTD .... Respondent
Through: Mr. Simran Mehta with Ms. Swati R.K. and Mr. Shivank Datta, Advocates.
And
R-27
+ ITA 138/2005
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel.
versus
GOYAL M.G. GLASS LTD .... Respondent
Through: Mr. Simran Mehta with Ms. Swati R.K. and Mr. Shivank Datta, Advocates.
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
%
O R D E R04.07.2017
ITA 92/2005 & ITA 138/2005
1. These appeals are directed against the impugned order dated 23[rd] July 2004 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA Nos. 3169/Del/2000 and 131/Del/2001 for the Assessment Years 1996-97 and 1997-98.
2. While admitting these appeals on 12[th] December 2005, the following question was framed for consideration: question was framed for consideration:
“Whether the ITAT was correct in law in holding that the Assessee is entitled to 100% depreciation and not 25% depreciation in respect of tankers on which cylinders are mounted?
3. It is not in dispute that the above question stands answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Goyal MG Gases Limited (2008) 296 ITR 72 (Del).
4. These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
JULY 04, 2017
Rm
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
ITA 92/2005 & ITA 138/2005
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.