In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hdfc Securities Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: 2.Admit, on the following substantial question of law: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was right in holding that depreciation u/s.32 of the I.T.Act amounting to Rs.
Decision: Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2836 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
HDFC Securities Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 19TH DECEMBER,2009
DATE :
P.C.
1.Heard Counsel for the parties. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
2.Admit, on the following substantial question of law:
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was right in holding that depreciation u/s.32 of the I.T.Act amounting to Rs. 30,39,239/- is allowable on the membership card of the Stock Exchange?
3.Learned counsel for both the parties fairly state that the question raised in the appeal has already been answered by this Court in favour of the Revenue in the case of CIT Vs. Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd.(2009) 184 Taxman 102 (Bom.). In this view of the matter, the appeal is allowed by answering the question in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.