The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Heard The Learned Counsel For The Parties. By
High Court
11 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Heard The Learned Counsel For The Parties. By
Date of order
11 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Heard The Learned Counsel For The Parties. By, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3710 OF 2008
IN
INCOMETAX APPEAL (L)NO.2076 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3712 OF 2008ININCOMETAX APPEAL (L)NO.2079 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3713 OF 2008ININCOMETAX APPEAL (L)NO.2078 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3714 OF 2008
ININCOMETAX APPEAL (L)NO.2077 OF 2008
INCOME
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.Smt.Jyoti H.Mehta
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2008
P.C.
.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue