The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hutatma Jaywantrao Patil Ssk Ltd
High Court
10 Apr 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hutatma Jaywantrao Patil Ssk Ltd
Date of order
10 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hutatma Jaywantrao Patil Ssk Ltd, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8251 OF 2013 IN
TAX APPEAL NO.52 OF 2010
(The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hutatma Jaywantrao Patil SSK Ltd.)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri Alok Sharma, Advocate for applicantShri R.M. Sharma, Advocate for respondent
.....
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA ANDA.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATED :
10th April, 2015.
1.By this application, the applicant seeks correction in the name of the non applicant. It appears that the mistake committed is bonafide. In light of that, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
fmp/ca8251.13
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue