Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. In Thi...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. In This Appeal By The Revenue For The Assessment Year 2004

High Court 12 Mar 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. In This Appeal By The Revenue For The Assessment Year 2004
Date of order
12 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. In This Appeal By The Revenue For The Assessment Year 2004, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: In this Appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2004- 05, following question has been raised for our consideration:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in directing the Assessing Officer to work out the deduction in accordance with the p...

Decision: 4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.315 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant.V/s.M/s. IPCA Laboratories Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Padma Divakar, for the Appellant.Mr. F. V. Irani with Mr. A. K. Jasani, for the Respondent. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 12[th] MARCH, 2013. In this Appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2004- 05, following question has been raised for our consideration:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in directing the Assessing Officer to work out the deduction in accordance with the principles laid down by the High Court in the case of M/s. Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. v/s. DCIT & Another, reported in 332 ITR 42 as the said decision has not been accepted by the Appellate Revenue in principle? 2By the impugned order, the Tribunal has restored the issue to the Assessing Officer to work out the deduction in the light of the decision S.R.JOSHI1 of 2 of this Court in the matter of M/s. Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. v/s. DCIT& Another, reported in 332 ITR 42. 3In these circumstances, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan