In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Income Tax Appeal (L), the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In this view of the matter, all the above appeals stand dismissed as barred by limitation on the statement made by learned Counsel for the appellant.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2494 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.J.B.Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Mr.S.J.Mehta for respondent.
..Appellant..Respondent
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2495 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.M/s.Borosil Glass Works Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr.Sameer Chitnis i/b. Crawford Bayley & Co. for respondent
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2493 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Henkel Chemicals (I) Ltd.
..Appellant..Respondent
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2496 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Artifriction Bearings Corpn. Ltd.
..Appellant..Respondent
Mr.D.Athavle for appellant in all the appeals. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 1ST JULY, 2009
P.C.
Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that no Notice of Motion has been taken out for condonation of delay in any of the above appeals. In this view of the matter, all the above appeals stand dismissed as barred by limitation on the statement made by learned Counsel for the appellant.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue