The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr
High Court
24 Aug 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr
Date of order
24 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the petition is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1008 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
.. Petitioner
V/s
Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr... Respondents
Mr. G.C. Srivastava i/b Ms. Anamica Malhotra for the petitioner.
Mr. S.E. Dastur, Senior Advocate with Mr.P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate, Mr. Nishant Thakkar and Mr. B.D. Damodar i/b Kanga & Co. for respondent no.2.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ.DATE : 24TH AUGUST 2009
P.C.:
1.Considering the issue involved in this petition is similar to what was in issue in Writ Petition No.1119 of 2009 disposed of today and as the respondent no.2 has disclosed the additional income which was earlier not disclosed, we are not inclined to interfere in the exercise of our extraordinary jurisdiction. Hence, the petition is rejected.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue