The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. International Global Network Bv
High Court
09 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. International Global Network Bv
Date of order
09 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. International Global Network Bv, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1632 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 835 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
International Global Network BV ... Respondent
Mr. Parag Vyas for Appellant.
Mr. Paras Kaka with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for
Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. This is a notice of motion for condoning delay of
600 days in filing the main tax appeal. On perusal
of the affidavit in support of the notice of Motion,
we find that the file was sent to the Law Ministry
for drafting the appeal on 25.10.2004 and the draft
appeal was received on 5.4.2006. In our view, the
aforesaid period of more than 1.1/2 years for
drafting appeal memo cannot be said to be
reasonable. In the circumstances, sufficient cause
is not shown to condone the delay. Hence, Notice of
Motion is dismissed.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue