Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jaisal...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jaisal & Ors. Trust

High Court 31 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jaisal & Ors. Trust
Date of order
31 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jaisal & Ors. Trust, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The revenue had filed this appeal and had formulated the following questions : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in Law the Hon’ble ITAT was correct in holding that the Assessee should be assessed in the status of "an individual" and not in the status of "association of...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 692 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Versus Jaisal & Ors. Trust .. Respondent Mr. A.S. Rao i/by Pankaj Kapoor for Appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: JULY 31, 2007 CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: JULY 31, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . The revenue had filed this appeal and had formulated the following questions : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in Law the Hon’ble ITAT was correct in holding that the Assessee should be assessed in the status of "an individual" and not in the status of "association of persons" and consequently the long term capital gain was taxable at 20%?" . In our opinion, the issue is covered by the ((-2-)) judgment of the Coordinate Bench of this court in C.O.I. Vs. Marsons Beneficiary Trust, 188 ITR 224 which view has been; reiterated by another Coordinate Bench of this court in the case of Directorate of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. Shardaben Bhagubhai Mafatlal Public Charitable Trust, 247 ITR 1. Considering the above, Appeal dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan